Tuesday, April 5, 2011

why teens are not activist when Boomers were?


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/movies/regeneration-a-rallying-cry-for-apathetic-teens/article1970498/

D: student loans.

Why aren’t they as galvanized as the so-called great generation that fought the Second World War or the baby boomers protesting during the 1960s, the film asks?

A wealth of factors are cited by the talking heads, from parenting to media to education. They boil down to what Chomsky points to as an institutional system of control. Parents want their children to excel, so they shelter and coddle them. The media feeds them advertising at every turn. Then as they set out as young adults, huge student loans force young people to take company jobs to pay off their debt, and so the cycle continues, Chomsky and others argue.

Monday, January 17, 2011

state of pension plans

http://www.cga-canada.org/en-ca/ResearchAndAdvocacy/AreasofInterest/Pensions/Pages/_ca_pensions_index.aspx

Boomers to place enormous demands on retirement system

* Post retirement expectations and needs of the “boomer” generations will place enormous demands on the country’s health and social support systems.
* Long term demographic trends challenge the Canadian retirement system – the working age population will conceivably shrink further in the years to come and baby-boomers will progressively leave the workplace.
* Decline in the numbers of the working-age population will inflict constriction of funding into the retirement system.
* Unless this dual pressure on the system is otherwise relieved and counterbalanced by prudent regulatory and pecuniary policies, steady disintegration will befall Canada’s retirement system(s).

Recommendations
Design new pension system that is fair to all Canadians both now and in the future

* Design a pension system that is sustainable in the long term, fair to present and future generations, simple to administer, and cost effective.
* Recognize pension benefits as deferred compensation.
* Consider adaptations of the “Hybrid Model” (Cash Balance Plans) that can, going forward, substitute for current DB and DC plan models.
* Establish a common pension regulator to monitor the retirement system and adherence to the principle of “one law, one regulator”.
* Examine the prospect of introducing universal and compulsory coverage of all working Canadians.
* Consider consolidation of the oversight of private sector registered pension plans under the authority of the proposed common pension regulator for achieving efficiency and economy of scale.
* Harmonizing more fully the tax treatment of all pension plan transactions, including funding and payout irrespective of their origin and structure.
* Codify a set of guiding principles aimed at guarding the system against human error and external shocks.

D - in other words, there is an intergenerational crunch coming.
Right.

j

j

Sunday, January 2, 2011

usa - unfunded social program liabilities, payroll tax

http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba662

Future Payroll Tax Burdens. Currently, a 12.4 percent payroll tax on wages funds Social Se­curity and a 2.9 percent payroll tax funds Medicare Part A (Hospital Insurance). But if payroll tax rates rise to meet unfunded obligations:

* When today's college students reach retirement (about 2054), Social Security alone will require a 16.6 percent payroll tax, one-third greater than today's rate.
* When Medicare Part A is included, the payroll tax burden will rise to 25.7 percent - more than one of every four dollars workers will earn that year.
* If Medicare Part B (physician services) and Part D are included, the total Social Security/Medicare burden will climb to 37 percent of payroll by 2054 - one in three dollars of taxable payroll, and twice the size of today's payroll tax burden!

Thus, more than one-third of the wages workers earn in 2054 will need to be committed to pay benefits promised under current law. That is before any bridges or highways are built and before any teachers' or police officers' salaries are paid.

---
D - wow.
How do Canadian stats stack up?

How would you feel if the Canadian government sent you a letter suggesting you owe an extra $150,000?

No doubt few, if any, Canadians would welcome that news. But that's the situation facing Canadian taxpayers as each of us is on the hook for another $150,211 in liabilities that our governments have racked up in debt and unfunded program obligations.

Unless immediate action is taken to reduce Canada's liabilities, young Canadians will be hit with a significantly larger tax bill in the future.

D - debt needs to be understood to be an intergenerational issue.
The Boomers are on a date with Gen XYZ. They leave early after ordering the lobster and champagne. And leave the bill. We don't even get to grasp a knee under the table for it! (!)

http://www.canada.com/story_print.html?id=d254af34-6191-4989-8d36-54a3b23be2ce&sponsor=

Consider the Old Age Security (OAS) program, the "cornerstone" of Canada's retirement income system. Old Age Security pensions are available to all Canadian citizens and legal residents 65 years and older, providing they have lived in Canada for a minimum of 10 years of their adult lives.

The problem with Old Age Security benefits is they are paid for out of current federal tax revenue.

At their inception, programs like OAS were based on the assumption that the demographics prevailing in the 1960s would persist. It was considered favourable social and economic policy to transfer a small amount of money from a large group of younger workers to benefit a small group of relatively poor retirees.

D: we've known for a very long time this assumption is incorrect.
So why no reform?
Easy. Boomers wait to retire. Then leave nearly the entire bill to the younglings.

In 1956, only 7.7 per cent of Canadians were over 65 years old. That proportion increased to 13.3 per cent in 2006 and is expected to rise to 26.5 per cent by 2040.

Adding the unfunded liabilities of the Old Age Security program and Medicare to that of the Canada Pension Plan ($538 billion) puts total Canadian unfunded liabilities at $1.3 trillion.

Further, these unfunded liabilities have increased by more than 20 per cent over the most recent five years for which data are available (2000-2004).

Unfunded liabilities, coupled with the national debt, put Canadians on the hook for liabilities totalling $2.4 trillion or approximately $150,000 per taxpayer.

Saturday, December 18, 2010

quebec pension plad. a pyramid scheme.

http://www.torontosun.com/comment/columnists/eric_duhaime/2010/12/15/16567901.html

The actuarial report of the Quebec Pension Plan released by the Quebec government a few days ago shows us the QPP is going to hit a wall.

In 2024, the reserve will start declining, and by 2039 it will be completely empty.

Quebec workers now pay 9.9% of their income to the QPP. To have a balanced plan, a steady-state contribution rate should be 11.02%.

---
D: if boomers want full benefits they did not pay into, let them pay much more now.

Gen XY(Z) ought to be allowed to opt out.

This is a pyramind scheme.
But participation is mandated by law.

Monday, December 6, 2010

more poor young adults than retired.



D: though I'd like to think the young are more resilient and can handle it.
Still, it puts in context a single-minded focus on the old.

Here's an idea.
Stop hiking the clawback cutoff age on OAS benefits.

For 2009, the tax recovery applies to persons whose net income exceeds $66,335. For each $1 of income above this limit, the amount of basic Old Age Security pension reduces by $0.15.

----
Here's an idea - don't make working poor pay for those making 3-4x what they are!
This is the reverse of Robin Hood.

Sunday, October 17, 2010

tuition fees distract from mandatory fees

http://www.bulletin.uwaterloo.ca/2010/feb/04th.html

Undergraduate students (domestic)

* “Regulated” programs newly admitted students – 4.5%
* “Regulated” programs continuing students – 4%
* “Deregulated” programs newly admitted students – 8%
* “Deregulated” programs continuing students – 4%

Graduate students (domestic) – 3%

Hamdullahpur, vice-president academic and provost, who revealed that for 2009-2010, tuition fees, at $195 million, accounts for 45 per cent of the university’s revenue, compared to $191 million in government grants, or 44 per cent.

D: I found an article for another university that showed mandatory fees increasing at TWICE the rate of tuition. It was closer to 1000 bux than not.
Ignoring fees does a disservice to student when discussing the cost of education.

Incidental Fees
Lowest: $859
Highest: $1,165

http://www.schoolfinder.com/schools/fees.asp?SchoolCode=uwatl08&ProfileType=University&URL=index

NOTE: This fee is mandatory.

So we see that the cost of school continues to escalate far above the rate of inflation- or the increase in standard of living.